[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1
    On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 13:23 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > * Zhang, Yanmin <> wrote:
    > > I tested 2.6.24-rc1 on my x86_64 machine which has 2 quad-core processors.
    > >
    > > Comparing with 2.6.23, aim7 has about -30% regression. I did a bisect
    > > and found patch
    > >;a=commitdiff;h=b5869ce7f68b233ceb81465a7644be0d9a5f3dbb
    > > caused the issue.
    > weird, that's a commit diff - i.e. it changes no code.
    I got the tag from #git log. As for above link, I just added prior http address,
    so readers could check the patch by clicking.

    > > kbuild/SPECjbb2000/SPECjbb2005 also has big regressions. On my another
    > > tigerton machine (4 quad-core processors), SPECjbb2005 has more than
    > > -40% regression. I didn't do a bisect on such benchmark testing, but I
    > > suspect the root cause is like aim7's.
    > these two commits might be relevant:
    > 7a6c6bcee029a978f866511d6e41dbc7301fde4c
    I did a quick testing. This patch has no impact.

    > 95dbb421d12fdd9796ed153853daf3679809274f
    Above big patch doesn't include this one, which means if I do
    'git checkout b5869ce7f68b233ceb81465a7644be0d9a5f3dbb', the kernel doesn't include

    > but a bisection result would be the best info.
    I will do a bisect between 2.6.23 and tag 9c63d9c021f375a2708ad79043d6f4dd1291a085.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-29 03:29    [W:0.024 / U:60.924 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site