lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> We would need two fields in the policy structure
>
> 1. The specified nodemask (generally ignored)
>

What I've called pol->passed_nodemask.

> 2. The effective nodemask (specified & cpuset_mems_allowed)
>

Which is pol->v.nodes.

> If we have these two then its easy to get a bit further by making
> the first nodemask a relative nodemask. The calculation of the effective
> nodemask changes somewhat but the logic is then applicable to MPOL_BIND as
> well.
>

Agreed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-26 23:19    [W:0.106 / U:1.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site