Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:15:53 -0700 (PDT) | From | David Rientjes <> | Subject | Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option |
| |
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> We would need two fields in the policy structure > > 1. The specified nodemask (generally ignored) >
What I've called pol->passed_nodemask.
> 2. The effective nodemask (specified & cpuset_mems_allowed) >
Which is pol->v.nodes.
> If we have these two then its easy to get a bit further by making > the first nodemask a relative nodemask. The calculation of the effective > nodemask changes somewhat but the logic is then applicable to MPOL_BIND as > well. >
Agreed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |