[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Permit silencing of __deprecated warnings.
    Andrew Morton wrote:
    > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:06:13 -0400 (EDT) Jeff Garzik <> wrote:
    >> The __deprecated marker is quite useful in highlighting the remnants of
    >> old APIs that want removing.
    >> However, it is quite normal for one or more years to pass, before the
    >> (usually ancient, bitrotten) code in question is either updated or
    >> deleted.
    >> Thus, like __must_check, add a Kconfig option that permits the silencing
    >> of this compiler warning.
    >> This change mimics the ifdef-ery and Kconfig defaults of MUST_CHECK as
    >> closely as possible.
    > Sigh. Can't we just fix the dud code? Or mark it BROKEN and see what
    > happens?

    __deprecated has spread to just about every API that people don't
    consider fresh and up-to-date.

    Like I noted in the patch description, rewriting grotty ISA/MCA/etc.
    probe code is a thankless, boring task that few are crazy enough to
    attempt :)

    As you can see from the patch flood recently I /have/ been working
    through the dud code, but it will still take years. The changes
    required for each are on average ~200 LOC changed, if not more.

    But regardless... I don't see any reason to force every kernel build to
    remind us of grotty drivers. Where's the benefit? Everybody knows they
    are grotty.

    Like __must_check this option defaults to the current state of things --
    warnings -- so you have to take an extra step to turn them off.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-25 10:23    [W:0.043 / U:31.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site