Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:04:22 -0400 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe? |
| |
Jeff Garzik wrote: > Ismail Dönmez wrote: >> Thursday 25 October 2007 Tarihinde 17:55:00 yazmıştı: >>> I think the OpenBSD people decided to actually do something about this, >>> and I suspect it had *nothing* to do with license issues, and everything >>> to do with these kinds of problems. I wish them all the luck, although >>> personally I think LLVM is a much more interesting project. >> >> And on the LLVM side all hopes for clang [0] at least for better C++ >> error reporting ;-) >> >> [0] http://clang.llvm.org/ > > Someone should take 'sparse' and use that as a C language front-end to > LLVM...
Among clang's "features": "A single unified parser for C/ObjC/C++"
bleh. I cannot imagine how ugly a C parser gets, after being taught C++. IMO since you can basically redefine everything in C++, it's not a language but a proto-language.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |