[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface
    On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:50:29PM +0100, Simon Arlott wrote:
    > I currently have an LSM that only handles permissions for socket_bind
    > and socket_listen, I load it and then "capability" as secondary on
    > boot - but now I can't because the LSM framework is now just the LS
    > framework.
    > Why can't this "static LSM" change be a Kconfig option?
    > (I don't want to have to maintain my own reverted copy of security/,
    > or compile this into the kernel because then I can't ever modify and
    > reload it without rebooting.)

    Let's start with the more important questions:

    Did you submit your LSM for inclusion into the kernel?

    If yes, why wasn't it accepted?
    If no, why not?

    > Simon Arlott



    "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
    of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
    "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
    Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-24 14:57    [W:0.026 / U:6.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site