Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:06:49 -0700 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch] |
| |
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:31:28 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> Chris Wright wrote: > > Yes, and I think we can still improve performance although I can't > > see anyway to help out the modular case, so I guess it will have to > > incur the hit that's always been there. > > Broaden the paravirt patching machinery? >
so far I've something much simpler in mind, I have a first prototype and it shows code that is pretty much optimal on modern cpus.
I hope to have something postable in a week or so - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |