[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: LSM conversion to static interface
    On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Greg KH wrote:
    > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:24:42PM -0700, Thomas Fricaccia wrote:
    > > As Sarbanes-Oxley and
    > > other regulatory laws require these customers to use "standard
    > > kernels", the result is a rather dreary form of vendor lock-in, where the
    > > security framework is coupled to the distribution.
    > Wait, what?
    > Since when does Sarbanes-Oxley decree that a company must use a
    > "standard kernel"? And just exactly what defines such "standard
    > kernel"? Can you point out where in that bill it requires such a thing?

    Simple, these days Sarbanes-Oxley is the default argument behind anything being
    pushed down your throat in a company.



    Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --

    In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
    when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
    -- Linus Torvalds
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-23 18:55    [W:0.020 / U:3.972 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site