Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:18:21 -0700 | From | "Kok, Auke" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Add eeprom_bad_csum_allow module option to e1000. |
| |
Adam Jackson wrote: > When the EEPROM gets corrupted, you can fix it with ethtool, but only if > the module loads and creates a network device. But, without this option, > if the EEPROM is corrupted, the driver will not create a network device. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
NAK
wrong list, not sent to me, and while for e100 I was OK with this patch, for e1000 it really does not make sense to 'just allow' a bad checksum - if your eeprom is randomly messed up then you cannot just fix it like this anyway.
Auke
> --- > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c > index f1ce348..b308c32 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c > @@ -255,6 +255,10 @@ static int debug = NETIF_MSG_DRV | NETIF_MSG_PROBE; > module_param(debug, int, 0); > MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug level (0=none,...,16=all)"); > > +static int eeprom_bad_csum_allow = 0; > +module_param(eeprom_bad_csum_allow, int, 0); > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(eeprom_bad_csum_allow, "Allow bad eeprom checksums"); > + > /** > * e1000_init_module - Driver Registration Routine > * > @@ -1012,7 +1016,8 @@ e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, > > if (e1000_validate_eeprom_checksum(&adapter->hw) < 0) { > DPRINTK(PROBE, ERR, "The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid\n"); > - goto err_eeprom; > + if (!eeprom_bad_csum_allow) > + goto err_eeprom; > } > > /* copy the MAC address out of the EEPROM */ > @@ -1024,7 +1029,8 @@ e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, > > if (!is_valid_ether_addr(netdev->perm_addr)) { > DPRINTK(PROBE, ERR, "Invalid MAC Address\n"); > - goto err_eeprom; > + if (!eeprom_bad_csum_allow) > + goto err_eeprom; > } > > e1000_get_bus_info(&adapter->hw); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |