![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> [2007-10-02 10:14]: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 01:16:18AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > reviewed the August thread from your version 1 submission and the message I > > take away is that the code has been well-received and looks good when > > considered on its own merits, but selinux could probably be configured to > > do something sufficiently similar.> > > > I'd have trouble declaring that "but" to be a reason to not merge smack. > > I'm more thinking "let's merge it and see if people use it".> > I'm not sure this was discussed on the list, but as long as Casey doesn't > get rid of the magic symlinks (smackfs_follow_link), there's a clear NACK > from the VFS perspective. Any rationale for this NACK? Caseys patch doesn't add something crazy like "make symlinks depend on environment variables"; also, we already have something similar in-tree: /proc/self. Thomas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-10-02 10:39 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||