lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: x86 patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:37:03AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On 02 Oct 2007 08:18:17 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> >
> > > The clockevents patches are not included in this; but given the
> > > recent trouble i'm not 100% sure they are even ready yet.
>
> i'm curious, which "recent trouble" do you refer to? (The NMI watchdog
> bug [which is off by default] was fixed quickly. The C1E bug was found
> and fixed quickly. Anything else i missed?)

C1e and now the misrouted irq 0s Thomas reported.

Also i'm a little worried about the missing C1e check; it looks
like it needs a re-review to make sure not other infrastructure was
missing.

>
> > hm, well, I hope you and Thomas are on the same page regarding
> > precisely what the remaining issues are.
>
> i'd like to see the 64-bit clockevents (& dynticks) patches merged.
> Demand from users and distros is high.

I'm aware of that. No argument on that it will eventually go in.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-02 09:49    [W:0.134 / U:1.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site