![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Anyway, it breaks on ia64:> And on s390> In file included from arch/s390/kernel/binfmt_elf32.c:202: > arch/s390/kernel/../../../fs/binfmt_elf.c: In function 'load_elf_binary': > arch/s390/kernel/../../../fs/binfmt_elf.c:1088: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_randomize_brk' > I'll drop the patch.> Really we should fix the elf mess before we try and change it any more. ... back to this a week old thread about already dropped patch. I am thinking about going back to the original idea of just simply defining ARCH_HAS_RANDOMIZE_BRK and not caring for the ELF crap any more for now. This way the patch is as small as possible, and doesn't interfere with the ELF cross-arch craziness at all. Here I posted such version of the patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/22/254 and here you asked me to put empty stubs into elf.h, which turned out to be too headache for some archs: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/22/492 Does going back to the original ARCH_HAS_RANDOMIZE_BRK sound acceptable now, before the ELF stuff gets completely rewritten one day? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-10-20 00:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||