lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/9] irq-remove: core
    Date
    Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> writes:
    >
    > Do you think set_irqfunc_irq() should be called at all the callsites of
    > set_irq_regs(), or one the fix you mention is applied, do you think current
    > model is sufficient?

    Good question. At first glance I think the call sites are ok, that
    is where we have the information now. Non-genirq architectures needs
    work of course.

    However given the weird poll case etc that either we need to take this
    slow and delay this change until all of the drivers are fixed up, to
    not need an irq parameter (as you suggested). Or that we need to
    allow both forms of irq handler to coexist temporarily.

    Eric
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-19 21:57    [W:0.020 / U:0.784 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site