Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch 6/8] pull RT tasks | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:24:53 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 14:43 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > plain text document attachment (rt-balance-pull-tasks.patch)
> +static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq) > +{ > + struct task_struct *next; > + struct task_struct *p; > + struct rq *src_rq; > + int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu; > + int cpu; > + int ret = 0; > + > + assert_spin_locked(&this_rq->lock); > + > + if (likely(!atomic_read(&rt_overload))) > + return 0;
This seems to be the only usage of rt_overload. I'm not sure its worth keeping it around for this.
> + next = pick_next_task_rt(this_rq); > + > + for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, rto_cpumask) { > + if (this_cpu == cpu) > + continue;
...
> + } > + > + return ret; > +}
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |