Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:58:34 +0100 (BST) | From | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes |
| |
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> If we can't just cancel the work, can't we do something like > > if (cancel_work_sync(w)) > w->func(w); > > instead?
We do an equivalent of this -- all that we care about that w->func(w) would do is enable_irq() and the rest we want to skip at this point. We probably do not need the counter in the end though.
Maciej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |