[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/21] KGDB: Request to merge KGDB
    On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:25:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:23:10AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
    > > It would also be nice to balance this out with the utrace merge, as both
    > > are going to cause quite a lot of pain on the architecture side.
    > I don't think a utrace merge as in one big merge is going to happen ever.
    > It's just a too big patch doing too many things at once. And the flag day
    > for switching all architectures over is another blocker.

    I agree with Christoph - the fact that *all* architectures have to be
    either ptrace or utrace make it very very painful.

    What would be good is if some effort could be made by the utrace-
    interested parties to make the transition to utrace much less painful.
    For instance, I quite like the getregs/setregs abstractions, and it
    looks like these *could* be self-contained in a single patch. It
    would be nice if we could move architectures over to this one a time.
    Once that's in, that's one chunk of utrace merged.

    Russell King
    Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux -
    maintainer of:
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-18 17:59    [W:0.020 / U:3.348 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site