![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:47:41AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 October 2007 20:34:17 Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> > This patch implements a Refcount + Waitqueue based model for
> > cpu-hotplug.> > Hi Gautham,
Hi Rusty,
> > I can't see where you re-initialize the completion.
The cpu_hotplug.readers_done is a global variable which has been
initialized in cpu_hotplug_init.
So I am wondering is the re-initialization required ?
> > > +static void cpu_hotplug_begin(void)> > +{> > + mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);> > + cpu_hotplug.active_writer = current;> > + while (cpu_hotplug.refcount) {> > + mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);> > + wait_for_completion(&cpu_hotplug.readers_done);
> > + mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);> > + }> > AFAICT this will busy-wait on the second CPU hotplug.
>
Well when the first cpu_hotplug comes out of wait_for_completion, it
would have decremented the ->done count, so it's as good as new
for the second CPU hotplug, no?
> Cheers,> Rusty.
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
--
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-10-17 07:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||