Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:13:48 +0200 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] SPARC64: fix iommu sg chaining |
| |
On Wed, Oct 17 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:45:47 -0700 (PDT) > David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > > > From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> > > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:24:01 +0900 > > > > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:16:29 +0200 > > > Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 17 2007, David Miller wrote: > > > > > I would suggest that other sg_last() uses be audited for the same bug. > > > > > > > > Agree. > > > > > > Only libata, I think. > > > > There are a few other spots, like ide-scsi > > Oops, I missed that. But seems that we have only three, ide-scsi, > libata, sparc64 iommu.
And now only ide-scsi and libata, Dave killed sg_last() in sparc64 already. So less than I remember, I'd say kill it NOW...
-- Jens Axboe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |