lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] SPARC64: fix iommu sg chaining
On Wed, Oct 17 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> > From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:24:01 +0900
> >
> > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:16:29 +0200
> > > Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 17 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > > > > I would suggest that other sg_last() uses be audited for the same bug.
> > > >
> > > > Agree.
> > >
> > > Only libata, I think.
> >
> > There are a few other spots, like ide-scsi
>
> Oops, I missed that. But seems that we have only three, ide-scsi,
> libata, sparc64 iommu.

And now only ide-scsi and libata, Dave killed sg_last() in sparc64
already. So less than I remember, I'd say kill it NOW...

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-17 13:17    [W:0.125 / U:3.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site