lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: static LSM objection
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 02:42:27PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> I just wanted to voice my opinion about the static LSM changes.

Through the magic of greylisting (thanks vger) and IRC, I've just had a
chat with Arjan and GregKH about this stuff. So, just to follow up for
people interested in watching me talk to myself:

- while an LSM must be compiled in, they are not mutually exclusive,
and the desired module can be selected at boot-time.

As such, I don't have any strong objections. It'd be nice for folks
doing LSM development to allow for a way for it to be modular, but I'll let
them fight for that. :)

Sorry for the noise,

-Kees

--
Kees Cook
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-13 00:41    [W:0.490 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site