[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v5
    On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 12:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > On Thursday, 11 October 2007 04:13, Huang, Ying wrote:
    > > Kexec base hibernation has some potential advantages over uswsusp and
    > > TuxOnIce (suspend2). Some most obvious advantages are:
    > Well, I have some doubts as far as the obviousness is concerned.

    OK, I will remove the "obvious".

    > > 1. The hibernation image size can exceed half of memory size easily.
    > This is also possible with TuxOnIce.

    I will add detail description about this. It is possible with TuxOnIce,
    and hard with u/swsusp.

    > > 2. The hibernation image can be written to and read from almost
    > > anywhere, such as USB disk, NFS.
    > This is possible with uswsusp, at least in theory, probably with TuxOnIce too.

    I will remove this.

    > > 3. It is possible to eliminate freezer from kexec based hibernation
    > > implementation.
    > This isn't true as long as we have not changed the handling of devices
    > (which is in the works, but will take time).

    I know it has not been implemented yet. I just say that it is possible
    for khibernation and it is almost impossible for u/swsusp and TuxOnIce.

    > > 4. Based on kexec/kdump implementation, the kernel code needed is
    > > less.
    > Well, maybe.

    Best Regards,
    Huang Ying
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-12 05:21    [W:0.027 / U:25.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site