Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:21:30 +0200 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: coding for optimizations (Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386: mce cleanup part1: functional change) |
| |
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 05:26:09PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 01:14:29AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > [] > > It's also a quite ill idea to think about whether gcc might produce a > > few bytes more or less code at the if when there's such a long printk() > > in the middle... > > printk() problem was discussed with proper banana userspace replacement > proposition by me, so i don't care much. > > Though, why MCE can't be enabled/disabled by config option? Native > engineers from proper company should know what processors have this > feature... If kconfig isn't flexible for this, i'm glad to hear > opinions. If it's needed anyway, then sorry.
You should better say sorry for not having checked that it can already be disabled with a kconfig option...
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |