lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.21 -> 2.6.22 & 2.6.23-rc8 performance regression
Date

Already i did, and it didn't show real failure point.

On 01 Oct 2007 12:01:24 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote
> "Denys" <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com> writes:
>
> > by mistake i will miss a point (it can detect bug easily, IF softirq in
> > mpstat 1 will jump up to 30+%. On 2.6.21 it is always staying +-10%, on
> > "buggy" version it jumps up to 100%. Now cause less load at night up to 30-
> > 50%, so on hardware it is not very noticeable (thats why maybe not much
> > feedbacks), i am trying to utilise hardware maximum as possible - so i feel
> > regressions much more.
>
> You could use oprofile to find where the CPU time is spent
>
> -Andi


--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-01 12:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site