[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/24] Unionfs: Documentation
    In message <>, Trond Myklebust writes:

    > I'm saying that at the very least it should not Oops in these
    > situations. As to whether or not they are something you want to handle
    > more gracefully, that is up to you, but Oopses are definitely a
    > showstopper.
    > Trond

    I totally agree: oopsing is unacceptable. Instead Unionfs should handle it
    more gracefully than an oops.

    Now, a lot of this "scare" in the past couple of days had been the result of
    our documentation, which was intended to prevent people from mucking with
    the lower f/s. As Jeff said already yesterday, many of the possible oopses
    were already fixed, and you'll be hard pressed right now to be able to
    tickle more oopses. But, to be sure, we'll run more tests, and fix whatever
    else we can.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-09 19:37    [W:0.046 / U:4.544 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site