lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 9 Jan 2007 07:41:13 +0100
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: xfs_file_ioctl / xfs_freeze: BUG: warning at kernel/mutex-debug.c:80/debug_mutex_unlock()
* Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

> > Revert bd_mount_mutex back to a semaphore so that xfs_freeze -f 
> > /mnt/newtest; xfs_freeze -u /mnt/newtest works safely and doesn't 
> > produce lockdep warnings.
> 
> Sad.  The alternative would be to implement 
> mutex_unlock_dont_warn_if_a_different_task_did_it().  Ingo?  Possible?

i'd like to avoid it as much as i'd like to avoid having to add 
spin_unlock_dont_warn_if_a_different_task_did_it(). Unlocking by a 
different task is usually a sign of messy locking and bugs lurking. Is 
it really true that XFS's use of bd_mount_mutex is safe and justified?
	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-09 08:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2008