lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 9 Jan 2007 06:41:06 +0530
FromSrivatsa Vaddagiri <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fix-flush_workqueue-vs-cpu_dead-race-update
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:37:25AM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> One other approach I was thinking about, was to do all the hardwork in
> workqueue CPU_DOWN_PREPARE callback rather than in CPU_DEAD.

Between DOWN_PREPARE and DEAD, more work can get added to the cpu's
workqueue. So DOWN_PREPARE is kind of early to take_over_work ..

> We can call cleanup_workqueue_thread and take_over_work in DOWN_PREPARE,
> With that, I don't think we need to hold the workqueue_mutex across 
> these two callbacks and eliminate the deadlocks related to
> flush_workqueue.
> Do you think this approach would simply things around here?

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-09 00:49    [W:0.412 / U:0.550 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans