Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops | From | Rusty Russell <> | Date | Sun, 07 Jan 2007 16:35:59 +1100 |
| |
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 19:31 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 03:18:45AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > > PS. drm_memory.h has a "drm_follow_page": this forces us to uninline > > various page tables ops. Can this use follow_page() somehow, or do we > > need an "__follow_page" export for this case? > > Not if avoidable. And it seems avoidable as drm really should be using > vmalloc_to_page. Untested patch below:
Thanks Christoph, that patch looks great to me! I didn't know about vmalloc_to_page...
Want to produce a signed-off version?
Thanks, Rusty.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |