lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 05 Jan 2007 14:49:42 +0300
FromMichael Tokarev <>
SubjectRe: open(O_DIRECT) on a tmpfs?
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Michael Tokarev wrote:>> I wonder why open() with O_DIRECT (for example) bit set is
>> disallowed on a tmpfs (again, for example) filesystem,
>> returning EINVAL.
[]
> p.s.  You said "O_DIRECT (for example)" - what other open
> flag do you think tmpfs should support which it does not?

Well.  Somehow I was under an impression O_SYNC behaves the
same as O_DIRECT on a tmpfs.  But I was wrong - tmpfs permits
O_SYNC opens just fine.  Strange thing to do having in mind
its behaviour with O_DIRECT - to me it's inconsistent ;)
But that's it - looks like only O_DIRECT is "mishandled"
(which is not a big deal obviously).

Thanks for your time!

/mjt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-05 12:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2008