[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [UPDATED PATCH] fix memory corruption from misinterpreted bad_inode_ops return values
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Well, that probably would work, but it's also true that returning a 64-bit
> value on a 32-bit platform really _does_ depend on more than the size.

Yeah, obviously this is restricted to the signed-integer case. My point
was just that you could have the compiler figure out which variant to pick
for loff_t automatically.

> "let's not play tricks with function types at all".

I think I agree. The real (but harder) fix for the wasted space issue
would be to get the toolchain to automatically combine functions that
end up compiling into identical assembly.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-05 00:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean