![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Ingo Molnar a écrit : > * Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@bull.net> wrote: > >> Ingo Molnar a écrit : >>> looks good to me in principle. The size of the patch is scary - is there >>> really no simpler way? >> Humf, in fact, for the 64-bit part, I've followed the rule of the >> existing 64-bit code in futex.c, which consists of duplicating all the >> functions which can not be kept common, and add a suffix 64 to all >> duplicated functions. Perhaps I missed something ? > > i dont think you missed anything - but some consolidation here would be > nice. Only if possible of course :-) Ok ;-) So, you are not only speaking about "my" part of duplicated code, right ? But, just for information, what is the sys_futex64 for, exactly ? Is there a plan to have in the future a 64-bit PID ? Because for now, 32-bits futex is enough, so... ? Otherwise, I don't have a "clean" way to avoid this duplication.... :-/ -- Pierre Peiffer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-01-04 09:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||