lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC,PATCHSET] Managed device resources
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 05:26:43PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> >Hm, but I guess without the follow-up patches for libata, it will not
> >really get tested much. Jeff, if I accept this, what's your feelings of
> >letting libata be the "test bed" for it?
>
>
> It would be easiest for me to merge this through my
> libata-dev.git#upstream tree. That will auto-propagate it to -mm, and
> ensure that both base and libata bits are sent in one batch.
>
> Just shout if you see NAK-able bits...
>
> Work for you?

That works for me.

The only question I have is on the EXPORT_SYMBOL() stuff for the new
driver/base/ functions. Tejun, traditionally the driver core has all
exported symbols marked with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). So, any objection to
marking the new ones (becides the "mirror" functions) in this manner?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-04 23:35    [W:0.059 / U:0.820 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site