![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 30 January 2007 22:20, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > >> Hi.>>>> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 14:57 +0000, Avi Kivity wrote: >> >>> Add the necessary callbacks to suspend and resume a host running kvm. This >>> is just a repeat of the cpu hotplug/unplug work.>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>>>> >> Maybe it's just a lack of understanding, but I'm wondering if this patch >> is necessary - we already hot-unplug secondary cpus prior to suspending >> devices.>> >> The on_each_cpu() in the patch really means on_this_cpu(). > Not with the reoredering patches that are in -mm, though. With these patches, > the nonboot CPUs are disabled after "regular" devices. > After that, it means on_each_cpu() again, and the hotplug patch becomes unnecessary (except to support hotplug, of course). Assuming I understand things correctly, which if not at all certain. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-01-31 10:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||