lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 31 Jan 2007 11:07:01 +0200
FromAvi Kivity <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: Host suspend/resume support
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 January 2007 22:20, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> >> Hi.>>>> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 14:57 +0000, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> >>> Add the necessary callbacks to suspend and resume a host running kvm.  This
>>> is just a repeat of the cpu hotplug/unplug work.>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>>>> >> Maybe it's just a lack of understanding, but I'm wondering if this patch
>> is necessary - we already hot-unplug secondary cpus prior to suspending
>> devices.>> >> 

The on_each_cpu() in the patch really means on_this_cpu().


> Not with the reoredering patches that are in -mm, though.  With these patches,
> the nonboot CPUs are disabled after "regular" devices.
> 


After that, it means on_each_cpu() again, and the hotplug patch becomes 
unnecessary (except to support hotplug, of course).

Assuming I understand things correctly, which if not at all certain.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-31 10:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2008