lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit
    On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:30:56PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
    >
    > Dave Jones wrote:
    > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:06:17AM +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote:
    > > > Then there is the issue of architectures, at least in my book KS should
    > > > focus on the ones that are really live and not in maintenance mode.
    > > > x86_64, x86_32, PPC, ia64, ARM seems to be the driving ones these days,
    > > > m68k, Sparc32, and others, somewhat less so .....
    > >
    > > Again, I don't recall us spending any time at all discussing m68k, or
    > > sparc, whilst the others you mention were well represented.
    >
    > Well, others where represented, I was there looking after non-mmu m68k
    > for example (and other general non-mmu stuff). There just wasn't much
    > contentious stuff in that space that needed wider discussion.

    Right, other than during the CPU architects panel, I don't remember
    any non x86/ia64/ppc stuff being brought up at all.

    Dave

    --
    http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-30 04:47    [W:5.338 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site