lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 29 Jan 2007 18:21:46 +1100
FromHerbert Xu <>
SubjectRe: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:43:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > IIRC Ingo had made fixes for the networking stack in his rt tree since
> > the networking code assumes in lots of places that rcu_read_lock
> > disables preemption.
> 
> oh.  We'd better find those fixes then.  I wonder what other code made that
> (rather hacky) assumption?  I guess we have enough debug stuff in there to
> find out..

Actually, maybe I was confusing this with the fixes Ingo had for
local_bh_disable vs. preemption in the -rt tree.  Ingo, do you
have preemptible RCU support in your -rt tree and if so did you
have to fix the networking stack to behave correctly with it?

It could also be that the fixes for local_bh_disable also masked
any problems that would trigger under preemptible RCU.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-29 08:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2008