![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 17:04 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 08:52:25AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: >>> Mmm. not wholly convinced that's true. Whilst i don't have lockmeter >>> stats to hand, the heavy time in __d_lookup seems to indicate we may >>> still have a problem to me. I guess we could move the spinlocks out >>> of line again to test this fairly easily (or get lockmeter upstream). >> We definitly should get lockmeter in. Does anyone volunteer for doing >> the cleanup and merged? > > specifically; implementing it on top of lockdep should be very lean and > simple... cc: John Hawkes, if we're going to discuss this ;-) M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-01-29 02:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||