![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 08:52:25AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: >> Mmm. not wholly convinced that's true. Whilst i don't have lockmeter >> stats to hand, the heavy time in __d_lookup seems to indicate we may >> still have a problem to me. I guess we could move the spinlocks out >> of line again to test this fairly easily (or get lockmeter upstream). > > We definitly should get lockmeter in. Does anyone volunteer for doing > the cleanup and merged? On second thoughts .. I don't think it'd actually work for this since the locks aren't global. Not that it shouldn't be done anyway, but ... ISTR we still thought dcache scalability was a significant problem last time anyone looked at it seriously - just never got fixed. Dipankar? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-01-28 18:43 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||