Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:51:17 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control -v4 |
| |
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:03:37 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 22:04 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:31:43 -0800 (PST) > > Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > atomic_t is 32-bit. Put 16TB of memory under writeback and blam. > > > > > > We have systems with 8TB main memory and are able to get to 16TB. > > > > But I bet you don't use 4k pages on 'em ;) > > > > > Better change it now. > > > > yup. > > I can change to atomic_long_t but that would make this patch depend on > Mathieu Desnoyers' atomic.h patch series. > > Do I send out a -v5 with this, or should I send an incremental patch > once that hits your tree?
A patch against next -mm would suit, thanks.
(But we already use atomic_long_t in generic code?) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |