Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:18:02 +0000 | Subject | Re: sed _s_gnu_alternatives_ (Re: [rft] (g)awk substitution) | From | Oleg Verych <> |
| |
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 02:38:02PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > On Thursday 25 January 2007 2:14 pm, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > I believe "shift 5" is also SUSv3. :) > > > > If you have tested, please send ack or nack to us. > > I have not. I tested the one I sent. Today I'm at a different location than > that test environment. All I can try it on here is Ubuntu, and so could you > just as easily. > > As I said, I'm not particularly interested in a more intrusive solution > solving a problem I haven't actually seen. I don't see any obvious reason > why it wouldn't work, and yes it would probably also solve my problem, but I > still don't see why you think it's "better" than the three byte fix.
Ehhh. "I'm not guilty" issue. Well, fine ;)
If your current system is IA-32, or you have access to one, would you like to test scripts/makelst for me, as i'm seeing `bc' there. But my system have not one, i would like to replace it with shell or awk or whatever. TIA.
____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |