Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update | | From | Daniel Walker <> | | Date | Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:38:10 -0800 |
| |
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 07:32 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Although, to be fair, I do know that Daniel has future sched_clock > > related patches that need his cleanups [...] > > btw., i dont find those sched_clock() changes really acceptable in their > present form, and i've pointed out my reasons for that in the past, ~2 > months ago when Daniel last sent his cleanup queue.
I address your complaints .. You said you didn't want sched_clock to have the underlying clock selectable, and it's not any longer .. You also said I was adding cycles to the scheduling hot patch which I addressed , but it's not clear if really needed.
Daniel
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |