lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: "obsolete" versus "deprecated", and a new config option?
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> that's entirely a judgment call on the part of the code's maintainer.
> if something is both obsolete and broken, then make it depend on
> *both* OBSOLETE and BROKEN if you want. no big deal.
>

Yup.

OBSOLETE = might be broken, no one is planning to maintain it.
BROKEN = known to be broken.

They're by and large orthogonal.

-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-18 23:03    [W:0.042 / U:0.676 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site