lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 15 Jan 2007 09:46:49 -0600
SubjectRe: heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
From(Florin Iucha)
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 11:11:13PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Florin Iucha <florin@iucha.net> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Based on this info, I think we can rule out any USB. I will try
> > testing with NFS3 to see if the problem persists. Unfortunately there
> > is no oops or anything in "dmesg".
>
> Take a look at bz #7796, a NFS bug + fix. But my feelin is that this is
> older.

The reported had and oops? Luxury! I get nothing ;)

I am testing again, this time on 2.6.20-rc5 compiled with extra debug
and I got a couple dozens of:

"eth0: too many iterations (6) in nv_nic_irq."

in the kernel log.

florin

--
Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition.
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-15 17:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2010