Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:46:49 -0600 | | Subject | Re: heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2) | | From | (Florin Iucha) |
| |
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 11:11:13PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > Florin Iucha <florin@iucha.net> wrote: > > [...] > > > Based on this info, I think we can rule out any USB. I will try > > testing with NFS3 to see if the problem persists. Unfortunately there > > is no oops or anything in "dmesg". > > Take a look at bz #7796, a NFS bug + fix. But my feelin is that this is > older.
The reported had and oops? Luxury! I get nothing ;)
I am testing again, this time on 2.6.20-rc5 compiled with extra debug and I got a couple dozens of:
"eth0: too many iterations (6) in nv_nic_irq."
in the kernel log.
florin
-- Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |