lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromOliver Neukum <>
SubjectRe: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.20-rc4: usb somehow broken
DateMon, 15 Jan 2007 12:10:49 +0100
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 20:47 schrieb icxcnika@mar.tar.cc:
> > Can anyone suggest another approach?> >> > Alan Stern> > Just a thought, you could use both a blacklist approach, and a module 
> paramater, or something in sysfs, to allow specifying devices that won't 
> be suspend and resume compatible.

Upon further thought, a module parameter won't do as the problem
will arise without a driver loaded. A sysfs parameter turns the whole
affair into a race condition. Will you set the guard parameter before the
autosuspend logic strikes?
Unfortunately this leaves only the least attractive solution.

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-15 12:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2008