Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:43:10 +0200 | From | "Pekka Enberg" <> | Subject | Re: mprotect abuse in slim |
| |
On 1/11/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Right, but is returning -EINVAL to userspace on munmap a problem?
Yes, because an application has no way of reusing the revoked mapping range. The current patch should get this right, though.
On 1/11/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Thanks for the tw other patches - I'll give them a shot and check > out current munmap behavior just as soon as I get a chance.
I hacked the remaining open issues yesterday so please use this instead:
http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/penberg/linux/revoke/revoke-2.6.20-rc4
The one at kernel.org will be updated as well when mirroring catches up. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |