[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3)
    On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:21:23AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
    > On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > > > >Subject : BUG: at fs/inotify.c:172 set_dentry_child_flags()
    > > > >References :
    > > > >Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <>
    > > > >Handled-By : John McCutchan <>
    > > > >Status : problem is being debugged
    > > > I'm not sure that this is actually a regression for 2.6.20-rc.
    > > The submitter says it doesn't occur in 2.6.19.
    > Any chance that the submitter could do git bisect? (added to CC). From the
    > bugzilla entry it seems to be well reproducible for him.

    That's a possible but time intensive approach for this kind of bug.

    I'd expect bisecting such an "at least 1 times a day" bug to take at
    about one month.

    And that's not a high number, that's a realistic estimate considering
    that you have to test a dozen kernels and verifying that a kernel is
    good takes 2-3 days.

    > Jiri Kosina



    "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
    of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
    "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
    Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-01-11 13:05    [W:0.042 / U:2.384 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site