![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 05:27:10AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > both look good... I'd be in favor of this. Maybe also add a part > > about using GFP_KERNEL whenever possible, GFP_NOFS from filesystem > > writeout code and GFP_NOIO from block writeout code (and never doing > > in_interrupt()?GFP_ATOMIC:GFP_KERNEL !) > > it strikes me that that latter part is starting to go beyond the scope > of simple coding style aesthetics and getting into actual coding > distinctions. would that really be appropriate for the CodingStyle > doc? i'm just asking. Adding a separate 'good practices' doc wouldn't be a bad idea. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-01-01 19:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||