lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Opinion on ordering of writel vs. stores to RAM
From
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 05:55:19 -0400

> As (I think) BenH mentioned in another email, the normal way Linux
> handles these interfaces is for the primary API (readX, writeX) to be
> strongly ordered, strongly coherent, etc. And then there is a relaxed
> version without barriers and syncs, for the smart guys who know what
> they're doing

Indeed, I think that is the way to handle this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-09 12:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans