Messages in this thread | | | From | "Stuart MacDonald" <> | Subject | RE: bogofilter ate 3/5 | Date | Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:05:53 -0400 |
| |
From: Chase Venters [mailto:chase.venters@clientec.com] > What are you implying - that SpamCop doesn't make decisions > about who to > block and who to not block for third parties? Their weasel wording
It's not an implication, it's a fact.
> I will strongly criticize any service that purports to label > senders of > automatic responses as senders of unsolicited mail. The
What would you call it then when I receive a bounce/etc that is in reponse to a message someone else sent? I certainly never solicited that.
Perhaps you could send me your snail mail address; I'll solicit some junk mail but put your address down. But don't call it junk mail when you receive it, because it was solicited!
> And on the specific issue of autoresponders, I think a reasonable > compromise is to support DomainKeys. That way if a sender is > irritated > that they are receiving automatic responses from messages they didn't > send, they can personally take action to invalidate the forgery.
IMO one should never have to receive "automatic responses from messages they didn't send".
> But mark my words: Asking hosts to stop sending bounce messages or > automatic responses is insane and contrary to over a decade > of established > postmaster precedent.
Things change.
..Stu
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |