Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory) | From | Chandra Seetharaman <> | Date | Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:06:11 -0700 |
| |
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 00:47 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
<snip> > > Some not quite so urgent ones - like support for guarantees. I think this can
IMO, guarantee support should be considered to be part of the infrastructure. Controller functionalities/implementation will be different with/without guarantee support. In other words, adding guarantee feature later will cause re-implementations.
> be worked out as we make progress. > > > I agree with these requirements and lets move into this direction. > > But moving so far can't be done without accepting: > > 1. core functionality > > 2. accounting > > > > Some of the core functionality might be a limiting factor for the requirements. > Lets agree on the requirements, I think its a great step forward and then > build the core functionality with these requirements in mind. > > > Thanks, > > Kirill > > --
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose.... - sekharan@us.ibm.com | .......you may get it. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |