lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 6 Sep 2006 09:20:43 +0200
FromHeiko Carstens <>
SubjectRe: lockdep oddity
> > Found this will debugging some random memory corruptions that happen 
> > when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING and CONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY are both on. 
> > Switching both off or having only one of them on seems to work.
> 
> previously i had some weirdnesses with PROFILE_LIKELY too, they were 
> caused by it generating cross-calls from within lockdep. Do the 
> corruptions go away if you remove all likely() and unlikely() markings 
> from kernel/lockdep.c?

No, unfortunately that doesn't help. I'm also wondering why the profile
patch contains this:

+       if (ret)
+               likeliness->count[1]++;
+       else
+               likeliness->count[0]++;
This isn't smp safe. Is that on purpose or a bug?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-06 09:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2008