[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [stable] [PATCH] IA64,sparc: local DoS with corrupted ELFs
    On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:25:11PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
    > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 01:12:16PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
    > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:45:09AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
    > > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:27:33PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
    > > > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:24:05AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > > > > If MIPS and parisc don't matter for the stable tree (very possible - there
    > > > > > are no big commercial distributions for them), then dammit, neither should
    > > > > > ia64 and sparc (there are no big commercial distros for them either).
    > > > >
    > > > > Erm, RHEL and SLES both support ia64.
    > > >
    > > > Yes, but the -stable developers don't build for those arches, that's why
    > > > it was missed here.
    > >
    > > What's the easiest way to get coverage here? Sending a parisc
    > > workstation or server to someone? Giving accounts to some/all of the
    > > stable team? Finding someone who cares about parisc to join the stable
    > > team?
    > How about: Someone from that arch trying out the -stable release
    > canidates to make sure it doesn't break anything on their arches /
    > favorite machine?

    IMHO it's even simpler than that. You already announce release candidates
    with what you intend to push into next -stable. Those who complain that
    -stable breaks on them just get what they deserve. They're free to announce
    the problem and even provide a patch in order to fix the problem in next
    -stable ASAP, but I find it a bit easy to complain about the -stable team
    that some fixes break a few rarely tested pieces of software !

    I'd prefer that we get slightly more -stable releases with a few ones
    potentially wrong on rare occasions, than fewer ones which get released
    only once everyone agrees (ie mostly never).

    > And no, I really don't want a parisc machine here :)

    I have one right here serving my web pages, but I have to check that
    my toolchain is still OK (I don't build on it - 32 MB, NFS root). You
    don't know what you're missing :-)

    > thanks,
    > greg k-h


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-06 22:31    [W:0.020 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site