lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 9/13] BC: locked pages (charge hooks)
Nick,

> Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>
>
>>Introduce calls to BC core over the kernel to charge locked memory.
>>
>>Normaly new locked piece of memory may appear in insert_vm_struct,
>>but there are places (do_mmap_pgoff, dup_mmap etc) when new vma
>>is not inserted by insert_vm_struct(), but either link_vma-ed or
>>merged with some other - these places call BC code explicitly.
>>
>>Plus sys_mlock[all] itself has to be patched to charge/uncharge
>>needed amount of pages.
>
>
>
> I still haven't heard your good reasons why such a complex scheme is
> required when my really simple proposal of unconditionally charging
> the page to the container it was allocated by.
Nick can you elaborate what your proposal is?
Probably I missed it somewhere...

> That has the benefit of not being full of user explotable holes and
> also not putting such a huge burden on mm/ and the wider kernel in
> general.
I guess you will have to account locked pages still and
thus complexity won't be reduced much in this regard...

Thanks,
Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-06 16:27    [W:0.088 / U:24.760 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site