[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 05/16] GFS2: File and inode operations

    >> Is not there a better way to do this? Note that there is also a "nfsd4" process
    >> running. Do you really want to do a 'costly'
    >> strcmp(current->comm, "nfsd") != 0 && strcmp(current->comm, "nfsd4") != 0
    >> every time someone does a readdir? What if I run a userspace nfs daemon?
    >> What if that userspace daemon is called differently?
    >> jengelh@linux01:7 08:28:14 ~ > ps -e | grep nfs
    >> 5580 ? 00:00:08 rpc.nfsd
    >> jengelh@linux01:7 08:28:30 ~ > rpm -qf /usr/sbin/rpc.nfsd
    >> nfs-server-2.2beta51-209.2 (a userspace nfsd)
    >Ah, now this is a very tricky one to solve. Its on my todo list to look
    >at this area again. You are right that the test is bogus in that it
    >should only respond to the in kernel NFS server and the reason for its

    In that case, you could use the fact that ... (I'll express it in C code):

    is_kernel_task = !current->mm;

    >existence is due to locking issues with the way that NFS calls through
    >the VFS layer.

    Jan Engelhardt
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-04 17:03    [W:0.021 / U:314.420 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site